The internet has allowed pseudoscience to flourish. Artificial intelligence could help steer people away from the bad information.
How to identify and understand different types of denial: scientific, economic, humanitarian, political and crisis. As the effects of climate change become clearer and more ominous, fossil fuel companies face a choice: Defy warnings of catastrophic climate change, or envision their roles in a post-carbon world.
Tales of heroic rescues and bush Christmases in Australian fiction of the 19th century describe a time when the fire season was confined to summer. The interactive map in this product is currently offline.
Please download the data via this spreadsheet until it is back online. According to new analysis from the Center for American Progress, there are still elected officials in the th Congress, including representatives and 30 senators, who refuse to acknowledge the scientific evidence of human-caused climate change. All of these climate-denying elected officials have made recent statements casting doubt on the clear, established scientific consensus that the world is warming—and that human activity is to blame.
Furthermore, despite the decline in total overall deniers in Congress, a new concerning trend has emerged: Of the 69 freshmen representatives and senators elected to their respective offices in , one-third deny the science of climate change, including 20 new House Republicans and three-of-four new Republican senators.
It is stark and shocking that there are still elected officials in the U. Congress who deny or dodge clear scientific consensus, despite the obvious effects of climate change now accelerating across the country and globe. Climate change is no longer a distant threat looming in the future—nor has it been for quite some time. With the backdrop of a deadly pandemic, Americans last year had to flee their homes in the face of out-of-control wildfires and an unprecedented number of hurricanes and seek shelter from sweltering heat waves—events that exacerbate already-troubling racial and economic inequalities.
Sign Now. While more than 25 percent of elected officials in the th U. Congress refuse to accept this clear and experienced reality, the American public has noticed. Climate change featured prominently in the presidential election, with younger voters ranking climate action as their top priority.
The public knows how to solve climate change too—by deep and immediate cuts to U. According to exit polls on November 3, by Fox News, these investments are supported by 70 percent of the American public. In fact, according to the Pew Research Center , two-thirds of adults believe that the government is doing too little to address the climate crisis, and 80 percent support tougher limits on carbon pollution from power plants. It clearly shows that a number of conservative think tanks, trade associations, and advocacy organizations are the key organizational components of a well-organized climate change counter-movement.
There is a significant amount of funding used to perpetuate myths about climate change. Robert Brulle analyzed IRS data on philanthropic foundation funding between and to identify organizations involved in circulating denier arguments.
Total Foundation Funding Distribution — to from U. Climate Change Countermovement Organizations. Source: Institutionalizing Delay. I believe in following evidence and data," he said. Senator [7]. Following the science tells us two basic things: fossil fuel burning increases atmospheric levels of heat-trapping greenhouse gases, and greenhouse gas increases warm the planet.
March 14,
0コメント